Incremental dynamic controllability revisited

15Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Simple Temporal Networks with Uncertainty (STNUs) allow the representation of temporal problems where some durations are determined by nature, as is often the case for actions in planning. As such networks are generated it is essential to verify that they are dynamically controllable - executable regardless of the outcomes of uncontrollable durations - and to convert them to a dispatchable form. The previously published FastIDC algorithm achieves this incrementally and can therefore be used efficiently during plan construction. In this paper we show that FastIDC is not sound when new constraints are added, sometimes labeling networks as dynamically controllable when they are not. We analyze the algorithm, pinpoint the cause, and show how the algorithm can be modified to correctly detect uncontrollable networks. Copyright © 2013, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Temporal constraint networks

1452Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A structural characterization of temporal dynamic controllability

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dynamic controllability and dispatchability relationships

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic controllability of simple temporal networks with uncertainty: Simple rules and fast real-time execution

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient execution of dynamically controllable simple temporal networks with uncertainty

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nilsson, M., Kvarnström, J., & Doherty, P. (2013). Incremental dynamic controllability revisited. In ICAPS 2013 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (pp. 337–341). https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v23i1.13603

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

67%

Researcher 4

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

71%

Engineering 3

21%

Decision Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free