Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics in the Emergence of Special Relativity

  • Brown H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

“It is particularly interesting to point to progress in science towards new, better theories, entirely guided by factors internal to the old theory.” In his provocative 1971 essay on the ‘rationale’ of scientific discovery (Post 1971), Heinz Post gave this as one of the reasons for embarking on such a study. In the case of the emergence of special relativity, one of the four scientific revolutions Post discussed in defending his rationale of ‘conservative induction’, the observation is particularly apt. In the present paper, I want first to elaborate on this theme. Einstein’s 1905 postulates have larger “footprints” — to borrow Post’s term — in the “old theory” (if by this is meant the assortment of Maxwell-Lorentz ether electrodynamics, classical mechanics and thermodynamics) than is perhaps still widely appreciated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, H. R. (1993). Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics in the Emergence of Special Relativity (pp. 227–260). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1185-2_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free