Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize-GAMER)

74Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We created a new high-coverage, robust, and reproducible functional annotation of maize protein-coding genes based on Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments. Whereas the existing Phytozome and Gramene maize GO annotation sets only cover 41% and 56% of maize protein-coding genes, respectively, this study provides annotations for 100% of the genes. We also compared the quality of our newly derived annotations with the existing Gramene and Phytozome functional annotation sets by comparing all three to a manually annotated gold standard set of 1,619 genes where annotations were primarily inferred from direct assay or mutant phenotype. Evaluations based on the gold standard indicate that our new annotation set is measurably more accurate than those from Phytozome and Gramene. To derive this new high-coverage, high-confidence annotation set, we used sequence similarity and protein domain presence methods as well as mixed-method pipelines that were developed for the Critical Assessment of Function Annotation (CAFA) challenge. Our project to improve maize annotations is called maize-GAMER (GO Annotation Method, Evaluation, and Review), and the newly derived annotations are accessible via MaizeGDB (http://download.maizegdb.org/maize-GAMER) and CyVerse (B73 RefGen_v3 5b+ at doi.org/10.7946/P2S62P and B73 RefGen_v4 Zm00001d.2 at doi.org/10.7946/P2M925).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wimalanathan, K., Friedberg, I., Andorf, C. M., & Lawrence-Dill, C. J. (2018). Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize-GAMER). Plant Direct, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.52

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free