Countering uncertainty and ending up/down arguments: Prolegomena to a response to NAIL

32Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despites Franck's claim that public international law (PIL) has moved into its 'postontological state', where controversy no longer surrounds its status as law, controversies over the ontology of PIL, and especially of customary international law (CIL) remain endemic. These controversies fuel the attack by Critical Legal Studies (CLS), and New Approaches to International Law (NAIL), scholars against a liberal-legal order all too easily portrayed as fundamentally indeterminate, a cover for its subjects' political interests. These critiques cannot be simply ignored, but neither can they be met easily, nor without cost. While CLS, and other critical discourses, seek to 'uncover' andexplode' the ideologies and biases of law to demonstrate its inability to fulfil its promises, the present paper is intended to initiate the task of demanding that law, and especially CIL, live up to these very promises. But first, the nature of these promises, and the structure and purpose of law must be examined, analysed, and where necessary contested and decided; or rather, defined. In this regard, the hidden assumptions of legal theory must be uncovered and problematized; the debates over law must be disaggregated, before law itself can be properly determined. Only after these tasks have been completed can the nihilist challenges of NAIL be met. © EJIL 2005; all rights reserved.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Uncertainty in international law: A kelsenian perspective

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rebel Without a Cause? Martti Koskenniemi and the Critical Legal Project

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beckett, J. A. (2005). Countering uncertainty and ending up/down arguments: Prolegomena to a response to NAIL. European Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi115

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Researcher 3

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

92%

Philosophy 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free