Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Glenoid-Side Fixation Techniques for Superior Capsular Reconstruction

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was recently introduced as a treatment for irreparable superior rotator cuff tears in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to assess the biomechanical strength of 3 methods for fixation of the graft to the glenoid for SCR. It was hypothesized that a 4-anchor technique would provide greater load to failure than 3-anchor techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirty-six cadaveric specimens were randomized into 3 groups of previously established glenoid-side graft fixation techniques: (1) three 3.5-mm knotless screw-in anchors, (2) three 3.0-mm knotless push-in anchors, and (3) a 4-anchor hybrid construct with two 3.0-mm knotted push-in anchors and two 2.9-mm knotless push-in anchors. The repairs were cyclically loaded at 0.5 Hz from 10 to 200 N, then pulled to failure. Elongation, stiffness, maximum load at failure, and mode of failure were recorded and calculated. Results: There were no significant differences in graft elongation or stiffness among the 3 techniques (P >.37 and P >.26, respectively). Maximum load to failure was significantly greater in technique 1 (mean ± SD, 427.85 ± 119.70 N) than technique 3 (319.5 ± 57.60 N) (P = 0.024). There were no significant differences in load to failure between techniques 1 and 2 or between techniques 2 and 3. Conclusion: Glenoid-side graft fixation with 3 threaded 3.5-mm suture anchors showed a significant superior pull-out strength when compared with a 4-anchor hybrid technique and thus might be recommended in SCR for patients with irreparable superior rotator cuff tears to achieve maximum stability. Clinical Relevance: SCR presents a novel alternative for treatment of irreparable superior rotator cuff tears in younger patients. Glenoid fixation is essential to provide adequate fixation of the graft to prevent the humeral head from rising and to restore normal biomechanics.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pogorzelski, J., Muckenhirn, K. J., Mitchell, J. J., Katthagen, J. C., Schon, J. M., Dahl, K. D., … Millett, P. J. (2018). Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Glenoid-Side Fixation Techniques for Superior Capsular Reconstruction. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(4), 801–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517745626

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

59%

Researcher 9

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 44

76%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

16%

Engineering 4

7%

Sports and Recreations 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0