γ-MYN: A new algorithm for estimating Ka and Ks with consideration of variable substitution rates

93Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Over the past two decades, there have been several approximate methods that adopt different mutation models and used for estimating nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates (Ka and Ks) based on protein-coding sequences across species or even different evolutionary lineages. Among them, MYN method (a Modified version of Yang-Nielsen method) considers three major dynamic features of evolving DNA sequences-bias in transition/transversion rate, nucleotide frequency, and unequal transitional substitution but leaves out another important feature: unequal substitution rates among different sites or nucleotide positions. Results: We incorporated a new feature for analyzing evolving DNA sequences-unequal substitution rates among different sites-into MYN method, and proposed a modified version, namely γ (gamma)-MYN, based on an assumption that the evolutionary rate at each site follows a mode of γ-distribution. We applied γ-MYN to analyze the key estimator of selective pressure ω (Ka/Ks) and other relevant parameters in comparison to two other related methods, YN and MYN, and found that neglecting the variation of substitution rates among different sites may lead to biased estimations of ω. Our new method appears to have minimal deviations when relevant parameters vary within normal ranges defined by empirical data. Conclusion: Our results indicate that unequal substitution rates among different sites have variable influences on ω under different evolutionary rates while both transition/transversion rate ratio and unequal nucleotide frequencies affect Ka and Ks thus selective pressure ω. © 2009 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, D. P., Wan, H. L., Zhang, S., & Yu, J. (2009). γ-MYN: A new algorithm for estimating Ka and Ks with consideration of variable substitution rates. Biology Direct, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-4-20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free