Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV): The 4-year review of the real-life treatment experiences

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to study the real-life treatment results of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Design: This was a retrospective study. Methods: Patients with presumed age-related macular degeneration were reviewed, and PCV diagnosis was made using the EVEREST study criteria. Outcomes were changes in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness, time between treatments, follow-up time, and number of treatments. Results: The prevalence of PCV was 30.8%. At the beginning, 195 eyes received monotherapy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, either bevacizumab or ranibizumab, and only six eyes received the combination of anti-VEGF injection and photodynamic therapy (PDT) at the time of the first treatment. During the follow-up, some patients received “rescue or add-on” PDT when they had a poor response after anti-VEGF injections. After 4 years, the average number of injections was 8.25 and 9.15 for the anti-VEGF monotherapy and the combination groups, respectively. The average time between the first anti-VEGF injections and the first PDT was 21.4 months. The average VA in the anti-VEGF monotherapy group increased by 1.5 letters, whereas it decreased by 0.95 letters in the combination group (P=0.48). Conclusion: The review demonstrated the same visual outcomes between the combination therapy of anti-VEGF injections and rescue or add-on PDT vs monotherapy anti-VEGF injections in PCV treatment. When compared with EVEREST II and Planet studies, the “initial” or “rescue or add-on PDT” might have different effects on the final visual outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ratanasukon, M., Bhurayanontachai, P., & Jirarattanasopa, P. (2018). Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV): The 4-year review of the real-life treatment experiences. Clinical Ophthalmology, 12, 2177–2181. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S178228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free