First trimester prenatal diagnosis: Earlier is not necessarily better

12Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the past few years considerable attention has been given to a relatively new method of prenatal diagnosis known as chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Because CVS can be performed in the first trimester it is hailed by many as a significant advance over amniocentesis. What has not been as publicized, however, are the disadvantages of CVS and earlier prenatal diagnosis. The emotional costs of CVS in terms of the greater number of both spontaneous and selective abortions following CVS, the use of CVS for sex selection and, because of the greater social acceptability of first trimester abortion, the possibility of increased pressure on women to undergo prenatal diagnosis by health insurance companies, medical professionals and government agencies, all need to be weighed against the advantages of early prenatal diagnosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boss, J. A. (1994). First trimester prenatal diagnosis: Earlier is not necessarily better. Journal of Medical Ethics. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.3.146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free