Sensitivity analysis of seismic velocity and attenuation variations for longmaxi shale during hydraulic fracturing testing in laboratory

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During the hydraulic fracturing procedure in shale-gas exploitation, the poroelastic properties of shale formation can be altered significantly. However, it is difficult to evaluate these variations using microseismic field data. In this study, we conduct a hydro-fracturing experiment using Longmaxi shale, which is a major formation for shale-gas production in China, to simulate the water injection and rock fracturing procedure. The variation of the velocity and attenuation for primary/secondary (P/S) ultrasonic waves was investigated throughout the entire experimental procedure. The results show that the attenuation is more sensitive to sample rupture than the velocity. However, P-wave attenuation loses sensitivity to the water injection after the fractures are saturated with water. In that case, it is preferable to use S-wave attenuation to identify the opening/closing of the fractures. Based on the experimental results, we can conclude that the variation of the attenuation must be considered during microseismic data processing and interpretation.

Figures

  • Figure 1. X-ray CT images of the shale sample along two perpendicular scanning directions (indicated in the bottom right corner of each image) in the central position. (a,b) Scanning slices are parallel with and perpendicular to the bedding planes, respectively.
  • Figure 2. The configuration of PZTs and strain gauges mounted on the sample surface. The strain gauges are labeled e1–e4 and the horizontal and vertical strain can be measured for each strain gauge. The P-and S-wave sensors are labeled 1–12 (orange “+” symbols) and 13–20 (purple arrows), respectively. The red line indicates the pre-existing fracture generated during drying.
  • Figure 3. Preparing procedure for the shale sample before the hydraulic fracturing test. (a) Mount the end pieces; (b) Install the PZT sensors and strain gauges according to Figure 2; (c) Seal the sample using a silicone coat.
  • Figure 4. Schematic of the experimental setup for P- and S-wave velocity and attenuation measurement under a triaxial compression conditions.
  • Figure 5. Stress loading and water injection processes for the sample, and the plots of strain curves. (a) Numbers i–iv indicate loading and injection stages. P and P represent axial stress and confining pressure, respectively. f and f represent injection pressure from pump A and pump B, respectively; (b) Axial strains monitored by sensor e1–e4; (c) Circumferential strains monitored by sensor e2–e4, and the e1 was broken or shorted before the test.
  • Figure 6. Zoomed-in view of the test during stage iii and iv, respectively. (a,b) Plots of loading stress and injection pressure. (c,d) Relative axial strain curves. (e,f) Relative circumferential strain curves.
  • Figure 7. Exa ple of received ultrasonic wave signals and spectral ratio calculation of the quality factor. (a) A set of P-wave signals received at sensor No. 5 and transmitted from sensor No. 11; (b) ormalized spectrum example of the initial unattenuated P-waveform and one attenuated first-arrival P-waveform; (c) Spectral ratio calculation of Q by using the effective frequency band.
  • Figure 8. CT scanning slices of the sample along the axial direction and normal to the bedding plane. The labels (a–e) indicate the position of selected slices from x = −22.5 mm to x = 22.5 mm with 11 mm intervals.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhai, H., Chang, X., Wang, Y., Xue, Z., Lei, X., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Sensitivity analysis of seismic velocity and attenuation variations for longmaxi shale during hydraulic fracturing testing in laboratory. Energies, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091393

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

50%

Researcher 6

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 10

67%

Environmental Science 2

13%

Engineering 2

13%

Energy 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0