Influence of kinematic alignment on femorotibial kinematics in medial stabilized TKA design compared to mechanical alignment

3Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Worldwide more and more primary knee replacements are being performed. Kinematic alignment (KA) as one of many methods of surgical alignment has been shown to have a significant impact on kinematics and function. The aim of the present study was to compare KA and mechanical alignment (MA) with regard to femorotibial kinematics. Materials and methods: Eight fresh frozen human specimens were tested on a knee rig during active knee flexion from 30 to 130°. Within the same specimen a medial stabilized (MS) implant design was used first with KA and then with MA. Results: The femorotibial kinematics showed more internal rotation of the tibia in KA compared to MA. At the same time, there was a larger medial rotation point in KA. Both alignment methods showed femoral rollback over the knee bend. Conclusion: Relating to an increased internal rotation and a more precise medial pivot point, it can be concluded that KA combined with a MS implant design may partially support the reproduction of physiological knee joint mechanics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bauer, L., Woiczinski, M., Thorwächter, C., Müller, P. E., Holzapfel, B. M., Niethammer, T. R., & Simon, J. M. (2023). Influence of kinematic alignment on femorotibial kinematics in medial stabilized TKA design compared to mechanical alignment. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 143(7), 4339–4347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04661-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free