Utilization of patient portals: a cross-sectional study investigating associations with mobile app quality

5Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Mobile apps facilitate patients’ access to portals and interaction with their healthcare providers. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this trend globally, but little evidence exists on patient portal usage in the Middle East, where internet access and digital literacy are limited. Our study aimed to explore how users utilize a patient portal through its related mobile app (MyChart by EPIC). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of MyChart users, recruited from a tertiary care center in Lebanon. We collected MyChart usage patterns, perceived outcomes, and app quality, based on the Mobile Application Rating Scale (user version, uMARS), and sociodemographic factors. We examined associations between app usage, app quality, and sociodemographic factors using Pearson’s correlations, Chi-square, ANOVA, and t-tests. Results: 428 users completed the survey; they were primarily female (63%), aged 41.3 ± 15.6 years, with a higher education level (87%) and a relatively high crowding index of 1.4 ± 0.6. Most of the sample was in good and very good health (78%) and had no chronic illnesses (67%), and accessed the portal through MyChart once a month or less (76%). The most frequently used features were accessing health records (98%), scheduling appointments (67%), and messaging physicians (56%). According to uMARS completers (n = 200), the objective quality score was 3.8 ± 0.5, and the subjective quality was 3.6 ± 0.7. No significant association was found between overall app usage and the mobile app quality measured via uMARS. Moreover, app use frequency was negatively associated with education, socioeconomic status, and perceived health status. On the other hand, app use was positively related to having chronic conditions, the number of physician visits and subjective app quality. Conclusion: The patient portal usage was not associated with app quality but with some of the participants’ demographic factors. The app offers a user-friendly, good-quality interface to patient health records and physicians, appreciated chiefly by users with relatively low socioeconomic status and education. While this is encouraging, more research is needed to capture the usage patterns and perceptions of male patients and those with even lower education and socioeconomic status, to make patient portals more inclusive.

References Powered by Scopus

Mobile app rating scale: A new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps

1477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What Is It, Can It Be Measured, and Does It Matter?

1036Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and validation of the user version of the mobile application rating scale (uMARS)

482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing the Utilization of Self-Scheduling for Diagnostic Mammography at a Multisite Academic Institution: A Retrospective Cohort Study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consumer Access and Utilization of Patient Portals for Electronic Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El Yaman, N., Zeitoun, J., Diab, R., Mdaihly, M., Diab, R., Kobeissi, L., … Bardus, M. (2023). Utilization of patient portals: a cross-sectional study investigating associations with mobile app quality. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02252-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Researcher 3

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

35%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free