Multimodality detection of metastatic melanoma

16Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A retrospective evaluation of radionuclide liver and spleen scintigraphy (LS), ultrasonography (US), and computed tomography (CT) was performed in 88 patients who had pathologically proven cutaneous melanoma. In patients who had all three examinations (n = 24), the matrix analysis showed that CT was significantly more sensitive (0.94) in detecting intra-abdominal metastasis when compared to US (0.62, P < 0.05) and LS (0.38, P < 0.01). Sixty-four patients had only US and LS studies. In this group of patients US was found to be more sensitive than LS, 0.88 and 0.54 respectively (P < 0.01). Furthermore, when CT was compared with US, CT was shown to detect metastases significantly earlier than US (P = 0.03). Overall, CT provided the most accurate means for detecting the intra-abdominal metastases of cutaneous melanoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuan, A. K., Jackson, F. I., & Hanson, J. (1988). Multimodality detection of metastatic melanoma. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 81(10), 579–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107688808101009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free