Ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and long-term risk of breast cancer

70Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Previous studies of breast cancer risk after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment were inconclusive due to limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term risk of breast cancer after ovarian stimulation for IVF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Historical cohort (OMEGAstudy) with complete follow-up through December 2013 for 96% of the cohort. The cohort included 19158 women who started IVF treatment between 1983 and 1995 (IVF group) and 5950 women starting other fertility treatments between 1980 and 1995 (non-IVF group) from all 12 IVF clinics in the Netherlands. The median age at end of follow-up was 53.8 years for the IVF group and 55.3 years for the non-IVF group. EXPOSURES: Information on ovarian stimulation for IVF, other fertility treatments, and potential confounders was collected from medical records and through mailed questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women who underwent fertility treatments was obtained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (1989-2013). Breast cancer risk in the IVF group was compared with risks in the general population (standardized incidence ratios [SIRs]) and the non-IVF group (hazard ratios [HRs]). RESULTS: Among 25108 women (mean age at baseline, 32.8 years; mean number of IVF cycles, 3.6), 839 cases of invasive breast cancer and 109 cases of in situ breast cancer occurred after a median follow-up of 21.1 years. Breast cancer risk in IVF-treated women was not significantly different from that in the general population (SIR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.93-1.09]) and from the risk in the non-IVF group (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]). The cumulative incidences of breast cancer at age 55 were 3.0% for the IVF group and 2.9% for the non-IVF group (P =.85). The SIR did not increase with longer time since treatment (≥20 years) in the IVF group (0.92 [95% CI, 0.73-1.15]) or in the non-IVF group (1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Risk was significantly lower for those who underwent 7 or more IVF cycles (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39-0.77]) vs 1 to 2 IVF cycles and after poor response to the first IVF cycle (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.96] for <4 vs ≥4 collected oocytes). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among women undergoing fertility treatment in the Netherlands between 1980 and 1995, IVF treatment compared with non-IVF treatment was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer after a median follow-up of 21 years. Breast cancer risk among IVF-treated women was also not significantly different from that in the general population. These findings are consistent with absence of a significant increase in long-term risk of breast cancer among IVF-treated women.

References Powered by Scopus

Cancer statistics, 2016

23615Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: Collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer

2541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis

1748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: Factors related to IVF outcomes

241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How many oocytes are optimal to achieve multiple live births with one stimulation cycle? The one-and-done approach

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fertility and pregnancy issues in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Den Belt-Dusebout, A. W., Spaan, M., Lambalk, C. B., Kortman, M., Laven, J. S. E., Van Santbrink, E. J. P., … Van Leeuwen, F. E. (2016). Ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and long-term risk of breast cancer. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 316(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.9389

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

59%

Researcher 11

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 49

77%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

9%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

8%

Social Sciences 4

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 4
News Mentions: 11
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 510

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free