How much of CAM is based on research evidence?

25Citations
Citations of this article
140Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary estimate of how much CAM is evidence-based. For this purpose, I calculated the percentage of 685 treatment/condition pairings evaluated in the "Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine" which are supported by sound data. The resulting figure was 7.4.% For a range of reasons, it might be a gross over-estimate. Further investigations into this subject are required to arrive at more representative figures. Copyright © 2011 Edzard Ernst.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ernst, E. (2011). How much of CAM is based on research evidence? Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep044

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

61%

Researcher 20

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

61%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

17%

Psychology 10

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free