Pigeons transfer between conditional discriminations with differential outcomes in the absence of differential-sample-responding cues

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to perform two independent zero-delay conditional discriminations involving the same differential outcomes (i.e., food vs. a feeder light) and were then tested by replacing the samples from one of the tasks with those from the other. Differential responding to the two samples was required in Phase 1, in Phase 2, in neither phase, or in both phases. Half the pigeons in each group were then tested with associations that were either consistent with the presumed outcome expectancies established during Phases 1 and 2 (positive transfer condition) or inconsistent with those expectancies (negative transfer condition). The magnitude of the transfer effect was largest in the group that could use differential sample responding as a cue to mediate transfer, but significant transfer effects were also found in the groups that could use only outcome expectancies. Thus, differential sample responding contributes to, but does not account for, the differential-outcomes effect. © 1995 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sherburne, L. M., & Zentall, T. R. (1995). Pigeons transfer between conditional discriminations with differential outcomes in the absence of differential-sample-responding cues. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23(3), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198923

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free