Interactions between learner’s beliefs, behaviour and environment in online learning: Path analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Although, several factors have been identified as significant determinants in online learning, the human interactions with those factors and their effect on academic achievement are not fully elucidated. This study aims to determine the effect of self-regulated learning (SRL) on achievement in online learning through exploring the relations and interaction of the conception of learning, online discussion, and the e-learning experience. Methods: A non-probability convenience sample of 128 learners in the Health Professions Education program through online learning filled-out three self-reported questionnaires to assess SRL strategies, the conception of learning, the quality of e-Learning experience and online discussion. A scoring rubric was used to assess the online discussion contributions. A path analysis model was developed to examine the effect of self-regulated learning on achievement in online learning through exploring the relations and interaction among the other factors. Results: Path analysis showed that SRL has a statistically significant relationship with the quality of e-learning experience, and the conception of learning. On the other hand, there was no correlation with academic achievement and online discussion. However, academic achievement did show a correlation with online discussion. Conclusion: The study showed a dynamic interaction between the students’ beliefs and the surrounding environment that can significantly and directly affect their behaviour in online learning. Moreover, online discussion is an essential activity in online learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abouzeid, E., O’rourke, R., El-Wazir, Y., Hassan, N., Ra’oof, R. A., & Roberts, T. (2021). Interactions between learner’s beliefs, behaviour and environment in online learning: Path analysis. Asia Pacific Scholar, 6(2), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2021-6-2/OA2338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free