Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

  • Jaeger G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Quantum mechanics was initially formulated in what appeared to be two fundamentally distinct ways, as Matrix mechanics with operator matrices satisfying $$[Q_i,P_j]=i\hbar\delta_{ij}$$ , and Wave mechanics with the function $$\psi$$ satisfying $$i\hbar(\partial\psi(\vec{q})/\partial t)=H(\vec{q},\vec{p})\psi(\vec{q})$$ , the former developed by Heisenberg, Born and Jordan [73, 74],, and the latter by Schrödinger [393]. Dirac, Jordan, Pauli, and Schrödinger subsequently provided arguments for the equivalence of these two approaches. However, the Dirac–Jordan equivalence proof made use of the Dirac $$\delta$$ ‘function,’ which is not well defined as a function because it takes an infinite value at a single point although it can be given a proper definition as distribution (or “improper function”). Von Neumann finally rigorously proved the equivalence and derived the hydrogen atom energy eigenvalue spectrum by making use of Hilbert space, a separable complete vector space with an inner product and a countable, potentially infinite basis (cf. [282] and [281], Appendix 4), capturing the theory’s mathematical essence [473 – 477]. Much later, exploring some ideas of Dirac involving the Lagrangian and action [139], Feynman also produced a third, mathematically equivalent formulation of the theory [168].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jaeger, G. (2009). Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics (pp. 95–188). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92128-8_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free