'The street's got its advantages': Movement between sectors of the sex industry in a decriminalised environment

19Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article explores the movement of sex workers between sectors of the sex industry in New Zealand's decriminalised environment and motivations for working in these different venues. We argue for contextual, risk environment approaches to understanding risks associated with the different sectors and how these risks might influence the movement of sex workers between sectors. By doing so we also address arguments made by policy makers in different countries, with different ways of regulating sex work, for the eradication of the street-based sector of the sex industry. The findings are drawn from a survey of 772 sex workers and in-depth qualitative interviews with 58 sex workers in New Zealand. Findings suggest there is a growing private sector but little change in the size of the street-based sector following decriminalisation. Street-based sex workers argue the need to maximise earnings and that this is only possible from the street environment. They are prepared to make the trade-off of more money for less safety, something which managed sex workers are not prepared to do. This article demonstrates the relativity of risk perceptions and concludes that attempts to eradicate the street-based sector of the sex industry through more stringent regulatory practices are unrealistic and will only serve to place this vulnerable segment of the sex worker population at greater risk. It argues that in addition to decriminalisation, other social and economic policies are required to address risk and develop more enabling environments within the diverse sectors of the sex industry. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abel, G. M., & Fitzgerald, L. J. (2012). “The street’s got its advantages”: Movement between sectors of the sex industry in a decriminalised environment. Health, Risk and Society, 14(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2011.640664

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free