Markedly elevated lipid transfer inhibitor protein in hypercholesterolemic subjects is mitigated by plasma triglyceride levels

15Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Lipid transfer inhibitor protein (LTIP, apolipoprotein F) regulates the interaction of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) with lipoproteins and is postulated to enhance the ability of CETP to stimulate reverse cholesterol transport. The factors that regulate LTIP levels and control its biosynthesis are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that plasma LTIP is dramatically increased (3-fold) in hypercholesterolemic subjects with normal to mildly elevated plasma triglyceride (TG) levels compared with control subjects. LTIP in these subjects is not correlated with the extent of hypercholesterolemia or with low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein, or CETP levels. However, unlike CETP, LTIP levels correlate negatively with plasma TG levels. This association does not appear to reflect decreased LTIP synthesis, inasmuch as conditions that stimulate TG synthesis and secretion (200 μmol/L oleate) do not reduce LTIP secretion by SW872 or Caco-2 cells. In contrast, native or acetyl LDL stimulates LTIP secretion 2-fold. Importantly, although plasma LTIP typically resides on LDL, up to 25% of LTIP is bound to very low density lipoprotein when this lipoprotein is enriched in cholesteryl esters, as occurs in hypercholesterolemia. In summary, LTIP levels are markedly elevated by hypercholesterolemia; however, plasma TG levels attenuate this response. We hypothesize that this arises from an increased association of LTIP with very low density lipoprotein, leading to a more rapid clearance of the inhibitor from circulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morton, R. E., Nunes, V., Izem, L., & Quintão, E. (2001). Markedly elevated lipid transfer inhibitor protein in hypercholesterolemic subjects is mitigated by plasma triglyceride levels. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 21(10), 1642–1649. https://doi.org/10.1161/hq1001.096722

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free