Moral Education at Work: On the Scope of MacIntyre’s Concept of a Practice

27Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper seeks to show how MacIntyre’s concept of a practice can survive a series of ‘scope problems’ which threaten to render the concept inapplicable to business ethics. I begin by outlining MacIntyre’s concept of a practice before arguing that, despite an asymmetry between productive and non-productive practices, the elasticity of the concept of a practice allows us to accommodate productive and profitable activities. This elasticity of practices allows us to sidestep the problem of adjudicating between practitioners and non-practitioners as well as the problem of generic activities. I conclude by suggesting that the contemporary tendency to regard work as an object of consumption, rather than undermining MacIntyre’s account of practices, serves to demonstrate the potential breadth of its applicability.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinnicks, M. (2019). Moral Education at Work: On the Scope of MacIntyre’s Concept of a Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3753-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free