International health initiative: Development and pilot testing of a molecular diagnostics training program in Romania

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The implementation of nucleic acid testing in laboratory medicine has revolutionized clinical diagnosis. Unfortunately, incorporation of these technologies in less developed countries remains a challenge. Despite Romania's recent economic growth, the country is in dire need of medical and laboratory staff trained in modern technologies. The aim of the study was to develop a curriculum that could easily be delivered to laboratory professionals in Romania and to pilot test the effectiveness of the training in increasing their understanding of molecular tests. Methods: The program was developed in accordance with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) quality training standards. It was offered to 50 laboratory professionals and consisted of online, asynchronous lectures and optional synchronous review sessions. Training effectiveness was evaluated using CDC guidelines based on pre- and postassessment questions answered anonymously. Results: Forty-two people participated in the program, and 32 (81%) completed the training successfully. Based on 16 participants' self-assessment, the course was successful in improving learners' overall knowledge of molecular diagnostics - specifically, their understanding of molecular techniques and how to interpret results. Those participants were highly satisfied with the overall training. Conclusions: The piloted platform presented here is promising and can be a foundation for future larger-scale studies in countries with developing health systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fukuto, H. S., Nelepcu, I. I., Necula, S., Galli, N. E., & Viboud, G. I. (2023). International health initiative: Development and pilot testing of a molecular diagnostics training program in Romania. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 160(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad050

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free