Assessment of the competency profile of the head of pedagogy in Chilean educational centers in vulnerable contexts

1Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study focuses on the professional competency profile of the head of pedagogy in Chilean schools in vulnerable contexts, identifying its specific competencies associated with domains of fundamental competencies, contextualized within these type of centers and according to the profile that the employer sees fit. This is a qualitative research study of a single case that employs mixed methodology and ethnographic design-including the analysis of three official documents from the Pedagogical Management Committee-a focus group consisting of sostenedores-as well as three questionnaires answered by experts on the topic, and five working sessions with the aforementioned Committee. The results identify four domains: a) pedagogical leadership, referring to guiding and promoting teaching/learning processes for teachers; b) pedagogical-administrative support, as pertaining to coordinating, monitoring, and supporting teachers; c) curricular management of learning processes, as pertaining to monitoring school processes; and d) innovation project management, meaning directing and organizing innovation projects proposed by teachers. The study provides the identification of sixteen professional competencies pertaining to four domains applicable to vulnerable contexts, which were validated by higher education experts and sostenedores. The final profile is rated very high and high by the management entities that participated as a pilot sample during the application of the profile model.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montaner, D. V., Sallán, J. G., & Bustamante, J. G. (2019). Assessment of the competency profile of the head of pedagogy in Chilean educational centers in vulnerable contexts. Educacao e Pesquisa, 45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201945201975

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

25%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 5

45%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Computer Science 2

18%

Chemistry 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free