Weighting for health: Management, measurement and self-surveillance in the modern household

14Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Histories of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century medicine emphasise the rise of professional and scientific authority, and suggest a decline in domestic health initiatives. Exploring the example of weight management in Britain, we argue that domestic agency persisted and that new regimes of measurement and weighing were adapted to personal and familial preferences as they entered the household. Drawing on print sources and objects ranging from prescriptive literature to postcards and 'personal weighing machines', the article examines changing practices of self-management as cultural norms initially dictated by ideals of body shape and function gradually incorporated quantified targets. In the twentieth century, the domestic management of health-like the medical management of illness-was increasingly technologised and re-focused on quantitative indicators of 'normal' or 'pathological' embodiment. We ask: in relation to weight, how did quantification permeate the household, and what did this domestication of bodily surveillance mean to lay users?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bivins, R., & Marland, H. (2016, November 1). Weighting for health: Management, measurement and self-surveillance in the modern household. Social History of Medicine. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkw015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free