Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - A challenge to John Harris

38Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article challenges the view of disability presented by Harris in his article, 'Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?' It is argued that his definition of disability rests on an individual model of disability, where disability is regarded as a product of biological determinism or 'personal tragedy' in the individual. Within disability theory this view is often called 'the medical model' and it has been criticised for not being able to deal with the term 'disability', but only with impairment. The individual model of disability presupposes a necessary causal link between a certain condition in the individual and disablement. The shortcomings of such a view of disability are stated and it is argued that in order to have an adequate ethical discourse on gene therapy perspectives from disability research need to be taken into consideration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reindal, S. M. (2000). Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - A challenge to John Harris. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.2.89

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free