A skeptical view on the Hirsch index and its predictive power

19Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The h-index was proposed by Hirsch in 2005. It is now often used as a measure of scientific performance of individual researchers. Assuming that it has predictive power, the index is even considered in academic appointment processes and for the allocation of research resources. But this is questionable, because the development of the index is dominated by citations to rather old publications. This inert behavior is demonstrated for the citation record of W P Schleich. Other variants of the h-index are analyzed, in particular a timely h-index h t which takes into account only the publications and citations of the previous t years. Finally, some alternative measures of scientific performance are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

8588Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theory and practise of the g-index

1812Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison

1182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

h <inf>α</inf> : An index to quantify an individual’s scientific leadership

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Publication Performance Through the Lens of the h-index: How Can We Solve the Problem of the Ties?

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A flexible approach for measuring author-level publishing performance

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schreiber, M. (2018). A skeptical view on the Hirsch index and its predictive power. Physica Scripta. Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aad959

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

57%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

63%

Decision Sciences 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free