Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S. Scientists, Engineers, and Educators

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Interdisciplinarity has the potential to lead to more innovation and advances in knowledge than are possible from a single discipline. Yet, little is known about interdisciplinary collaborations and the perceptions of those involved. This quantitative study investigated the perceptions of U.S. faculty, staff, postdocs, and graduate students involved in education and science/engineering collaborations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for two modified scales, Collaboration Perceptions (CP; n = 117; 17 items; α =.923) and Interdisciplinarity Perceptions (IP; n = 119; 11 items; α =.852). Participants’ perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity were strongly positive and did not significantly differ based on demographic factors (e.g., gender, discipline, role). Perceptions were influenced by collectivist orientation; the high collectivism group had significantly more positive perceptions of collaboration and interdisciplinarity, and collectivist orientation was positively and significantly correlated with CP and IP scores. Implications and recommendations for interdisciplinary collaborations will be discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

78842Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis

8466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sample size in factor analysis

3451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCance, K. R., & Blanchard, M. (2024). Measuring the Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration Perceptions of U.S. Scientists, Engineers, and Educators. AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231218952

Readers over time

‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 1

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0