Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density assessment: Applications for the US and abroad

48Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mammographic breast density (MBD) has been proven to be an important risk factor for breast cancer and an important determinant of mammographic screening performance. The measurement of density has changed dramatically since its inception. Initial qualitative measurement methods have been found to have limited consistency between readers, and in regards to breast cancer risk. Following the introduction of full-field digital mammography, more sophisticated measurement methodology is now possible. Automated computer-based density measurements can provide consistent, reproducible, and objective results. In this review paper, we describe various methods currently available to assess MBD, and provide a discussion on the clinical utility of such methods for breast cancer screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Destounis, S., Arieno, A., Morgan, R., Roberts, C., & Chan, A. (2017, June 1). Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density assessment: Applications for the US and abroad. Diagnostics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7020030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free