Response of barley genotypes to weed interference in Australia

19Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Weed-competitive genotypes could be an important tool in integrated weed management (IWM) practices. However, weed competitiveness is often not considered a priority for breeding high-yielding cultivars. Weed-competitive ability is often evaluated based on weed-suppressive ability (WSA) and weed-tolerance ability (WTA) parameters; however, there is little information on these aspects for barley genotypes in Australia. In this study, the effects of weed interference on eight barley genotypes were assessed. Two years of field experiments were performed in a split-plot design with three replications. Yield loss due to weed interference ranged from 43% to 78%. The weed yield amongst genotypes varied from 0.5 to 1.7 Mg ha−1. Relative yield loss due to weed interference was negatively correlated with WTA and WSA. A negative correlation was also found between WSA and weed seed production (r = −0.72). Similarly, a negative correlation was found between WTA and barley yield in the weedy environment (r = −0.91). The results suggest that a high tillering ability and plant height are desirable attributes for weed competitiveness in the barley genotypes. These results also demonstrated that among the eight barley genotypes, Commander exhibited superior WSA and WTA parameters and therefore, could be used in both low- and high-production systems for weed management. Westminster had a superior WSA parameter. Therefore, it could be used for weed management in organic production systems. These results also implied that genotypic ranking on the basis of WSA and WTA could be used as an important tool in strengthening IWM programs for barley.

References Powered by Scopus

The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds

298Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs ( Aster macrophyllus).

294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of different resource additions on species diversity in an annual plant community

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Regeneration capacity after exposure to freezing in wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu.) and turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All.) in comparison with winter wheat

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of the suitability of 10 winter triticale cultivars (x Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus) for organic agriculture: Polish case study

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of soil moisture levels on the growth and reproductive behaviour of Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahajan, G., Hickey, L., & Chauhan, B. S. (2020). Response of barley genotypes to weed interference in Australia. Agronomy, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010099

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Researcher 2

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

67%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

11%

Environmental Science 1

11%

Psychology 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free