Working orders in limit order markets and floor exchanges

39Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyze limit order markets and floor exchanges, assuming an informed trader and discretionary liquidity traders use market orders and can either submit block orders or work their demands as a series of small orders. By working their demands, large market order traders pool with small traders. We show that every equilibrium on a floor exchange must involve at least partial pooling. Moreover, there is always a fully pooling (worked order) equilibrium on a floor exchange that is equivalent to a block order equilibrium in a limit order market. © 2007 by The American Finance Association.

References Powered by Scopus

Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders

2932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Price, trade size, and information in securities markets

1079Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Constraints on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private information

912Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Informed traders and limit order markets

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automation, speed, and stock market quality: The NYSE's Hybrid

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Back, K., & Baruch, S. (2007). Working orders in limit order markets and floor exchanges. Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1589–1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01252.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

20%

Researcher 7

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 33

59%

Business, Management and Accounting 20

36%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Computer Science 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free