This article presents some results of a qualitative study on secondary teachers' beliefs, reconstructed as so-called individual curricula, a concept to represent a teacher's argumentative connections between his choice of content, methods, and goals of education. Within these individual curricula, two archetypes are figured out that are supposed to be oppositional in three dimensions: in the use of Geometrical Working Spaces in classroom teaching, in the general mathematical worldview, and in the choice of goals of education a teacher intends to achieve by teaching elementary geometry. The first archetype is characterised by deductive standards, a static view on mathematics, and expert-oriented goals of education; the second one is more empirical, dynamic, and guided by pragmatic goals of education.
CITATION STYLE
Girnat, B. (2015). Teachers’ Geometrical Paradigms as Central Curricular Beliefs in the Context of Mathematical Worldviews and Goals of Education (pp. 15–26). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09614-4_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.