Growth hormone (GH) assays: Influence of standard preparations, GH isoforms, assay characteristics, and GH-binding protein

95Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The impact of the adoption of the new biosynthetic growth hormone (GH) WHO International Reference Preparation (IRP 88/624), and the recommendation to report results in μg/L instead of mU/L, is described. Conversion factors were determined by comparing both the linear and nonlinear relations of the GH values. The Pharmacia polyclonal IRMA (p-IRMA) and the DELFIA® monoclonal time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (trIFMA) with kit calibrators calibrated either against the pituitary-derived WHO IRP 80/505 or the new 88/624 were evaluated. Conversion factors of 4.17 mU/L = 1 μg/L for the p- IRMA and 4.31 mU/L = 1 μg/L for the trIFMA were necessary. Different cross- reactivity patterns for the deaminated and dimer 22-kDa, 20-kDa, and 17-kDa GH isoforms were found. Expected GH recovery was similar when the measured values were adjusted according to the results of the cross-reactivity study.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jansson, C., Boguszewski, C., Rosberg, S., Carlsson, L., & Albertsson-Wikland, K. (1997). Growth hormone (GH) assays: Influence of standard preparations, GH isoforms, assay characteristics, and GH-binding protein. Clinical Chemistry, 43(6), 950–956. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.6.950

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

43%

Researcher 9

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 11

35%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

26%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

26%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free