Influence of seasons on the management and outcomes acute myocardial infarction: An 18-year US study

14Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on the seasonal variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the contemporary literature. Hypothesis: There would be decrease in the seasonal variation in the management and outcomes of AMI. Methods: Adult (>18 years) AMI admissions were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017). Seasons were classified as spring, summer, fall, and winter. Outcomes of interest included prevalence, in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Subgroup analyses for type of AMI and patient characteristics were performed. Results: Of the 10 880 856 AMI admissions, 24.3%, 22.9%, 22.2%, and 24.2% were admitted in spring, summer, fall, and winter, respectively. The four cohorts had comparable age, sex, race, and comorbidities distribution. Rates of coronary angiography and PCI were slightly but significantly lower in winter (62.6% and 40.7%) in comparison to the other seasons (64-65% and 42-43%, respectively) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vallabhajosyula, S., Patlolla, S. H., Cheungpasitporn, W., Holmes, D. R., & Gersh, B. J. (2020). Influence of seasons on the management and outcomes acute myocardial infarction: An 18-year US study. Clinical Cardiology, 43(10), 1175–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23428

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free