Touch ground: Introducing design inquiry in higher education

  • Stompff G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In higher education, design thinking is often taught as a process. Yet design cognition resides in action and design practices. Dewey's pragmatism offers a solid epistemology for design thinking. This paper describes a design research whereby Dewey's inquiry served as the foundation for educating students. Three extensive educational case studies are presented whereby a design inquiry was introduced and became part of the curricula. It was found that students and coaches struggled with doubts experienced as a result of the co-evolution of problem and solution, means and ends. Four coping mechanisms were observed: (1) focus on problems, risking analysis paralysis; (2) focus on creative problem-solving, risking unsubstantiated design; (3) focus on means, risking fixation; and (4) focus on future ends, risking hanging on to a dream. By establishing a joint practice and a community of learners through show-and-share sessions, the students establish solid ground.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stompff, G. (2022). Touch ground: Introducing design inquiry in higher education. In DRS2022: Bilbao. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.552

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free