Predicting violence in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim. Frequent expression of negative affects, hostility and violent behavior in individuals suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were recognized long ago, and have been retrospectively well documented in war veterans with PTSD who were shown to have an elevated risk for violent behavior when compared to both veterans without PTSD and other psychiatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical prediction of violence in combat veterans suffering from PTSD. Methods. The subjects of this study, 104 male combat veterans with PTSD were assessed with the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management 20 (HCR-20), a 20-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the risks for violence, and their acts of violence during one-year follow-up period were registered based on bimonthly check-up interviews. Results. Our findings showed that the HCR-20, as an actuarial measure, had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.82), excellent interrater reliability (Interaclass Correlation ICC = 0.85), as well as excellent predictive validity for acts of any violence, non-physical violence or physical violence in the follow-up period (AUC = 0.82-0.86). The HCR-20 also had good interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa = 0.74), and acceptable predictive accuracy for each outcome criterion (AUC = 0.73-0.79). Conclusion. The results of this research confirm that the HCR-20 may also be applied in prediction of violent behavior in the population of patients suffering from PTSD with reliability and validity comparable with the results of previous studies where this instrument was administered to other populations of psychiatric patients.

References Powered by Scopus

On the methods and theory of reliability

1147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coming to terms with the terms of risk

1115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The Clinical-Statistical Controversy

1035Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis

366Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement of Predictive Validity in Violence Risk Assessment Studies: A Second-Order Systematic Review

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jovanović, A. A., Toševski, D. L., Ivković, M., Damjanović, A., & Gašić, M. J. (2009). Predicting violence in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Vojnosanitetski Pregled, 66(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP0901013J

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

79%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

63%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Computer Science 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 8

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free