Exhaustivity as agreement: The case of Korean man 'only'

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The focus particle man'only' in Korean shows different scopal behavior depending upon its syntactic environment. This non-uniform scope pattern cannot be accounted for if the particle is a scope-bearing element. This paper argues that the particle man is not a scope-bearing element, but an agreement morpheme that indicates the presence of a null head ONLY. Under this proposal, the particle man does not carry the exhaustive meaning of only; the null head does. Therefore, it is the position of the ONLY head, not that of the particle, that determines the scopal relation with respect to other quantificational elements. This paper also claims that there is a strong correlation between syntax and morphology (Baker's Mirror Principle). Thus the relative order among the particle, case marker, and postposition reflects the hierarchy of corresponding functional heads. This helps detect the position of the ONLY head. The proposed analysis accounts for the scope patterns without making special stipulations about man-phrases. © Springer 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y. (2005). Exhaustivity as agreement: The case of Korean man “only.” Natural Language Semantics, 13(2), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-6410-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free