A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of naturally acquired shigellosis in rhesus and pigtailed macaques (Macaca mulatta and nemestrina)

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Shigella spp. are common enteric pathogens in captive non-human primates. Treatment of symptomatic infections involves supportive care and antibiotic therapy, typically with an empirical choice of antibiotic. Methods: Twenty-four clinically ill, Shigella PCR-positive animals were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: single-dose ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA), single-dose azithromycin gavage, a 5-day tapering azithromycin dose, or 7-day course of enrofloxacin. We hypothesized that all antimicrobial therapies would have similar efficacy. Results: Animals in all groups cleared Shigella, based on fecal PCR, and had resolution of clinical signs 2 weeks after treatment. Eight out of nine clinically ill and PCR-positive animals tested negative by fecal culture. Conclusions: Single-dose CCFA, single-dose azithromycin, and a 5-day tapering course of azithromycin all performed as well as a 7-day course of enrofloxacin in eliminating Shigella infection. Fecal PCR may be a better diagnostic than culture for Shigella.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maxwell, A. R., Herrod, J. A., & Hutchinson, E. K. (2022). A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of naturally acquired shigellosis in rhesus and pigtailed macaques (Macaca mulatta and nemestrina). Journal of Medical Primatology, 51(6), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free