"Pointwise" versus basis representations for two-dimensional spherical dynamics

31Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We compare pointwise representations and nondirect product basis representations for treating quantum dynamics in 2D (θ, φ) spherical polar coordinates. As pointwise representations we have considered a modified discrete variable representation (DVR) and the collocation representation (CR). As basis representations we used spherical harmonics with 2D Gaussian numerical quadratures (FBR) and the spectral collocation representation (SCR). These representations were tested on a simple model potential V(θ, φ) and on a realistic ArH2O potential (at fixed R) and the results were compared. The energies obtained from the pointwise representations considered were substantially less accurate than those obtained from the basis representations for given matrix sizes. The basis representations, especially the FBR, appear to require the least computational effort and to be the most simple and accurate for quantum problems in spherical polar coordinates. This illustrates the difficulties in using pointwise representations for angular problems which do not have good direct product bases. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharafeddin, O. A., & Light, J. C. (1995). “Pointwise” versus basis representations for two-dimensional spherical dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 102(9), 3622–3628. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.468591

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free