For years, English has been a compulsory subject for the students of non-English departments (henceforth English for SNED). The success of English for SNED at the tertiary level of education has largely been questioned due to various constraints in all levels of its operation. Related to the large resources involved, overall evaluation is necessary. This can be started with analysis of needs, which, in a large organization like university, should be done in two stages (Coleman, 1988). While the present sudy does not pretend that it could be regarded as Coleman's first stage of needs analysis, it would offere a significant contribution to such an undertaking. Carried out in Brawijaya University, this study was aimed at describing, through a set of questionnaires, the perception of graduates, English instructors and subject lecturers on (1) the aim of English for SNED, and (2) the role of references written in English in the level of study programs. As previous studies suggested, conflicting aims of English for SNED in the perception of respondents were identified. This study delienated four different groups with regards to the use of references written in English in the level of study programs.
CITATION STYLE
Winarni, I. (2015). English for Non English Department at Brawijaya University: How Essential? TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 16(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v16i1/93-109
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.