Three recommendations to engage At-Risk Students in Critical Reflection on Intelligent Technologies through Remote Learning

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The agenda of Computational Empowerment points towards the need for inclusive approaches for supporting all students in learning about technology and the development of digital literacy. This paper aims at exploring how to develop remote learning activities in technology education during a pandemic for at-risk students. We present a case study with 23 primary students (11-12 years) who we involved in online and offline learning activities about both how intelligent technologies work but also on the implications that these technologies bring to our society. Our findings showed potential challenges to engage at-risk students in the agenda of Computational Empowerment. We propose three recommendations and future directions to scaffold at-risk students' learning about intelligent technologies in remote contexts: (1) support the development of agency through the engagement of contexts-for-action; (2) reduce the complexity of remote communication through creative and bodily engagement; (3) reflect upon forces that marginalize oneself in a digitized society.

References Powered by Scopus

110491Citations
79900Readers
Get full text

What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations

819Citations
1252Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

25Citations
143Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaper, M. M., & Ruiz Garcia, A. (2023). Three recommendations to engage At-Risk Students in Critical Reflection on Intelligent Technologies through Remote Learning. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573862

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

43%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0