A tale of two colleges: do specialist trainees receive adequate hospital-based training?

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both medical and surgical trainees have a dual reliance on their specialist training college and their respective teaching hospitals to maintain standards in teaching and training. Although guidelines are in place for the administration of this teaching, hospital-based teaching has been minimally regulated. A review of trainee satisfaction with current levels of hospital-based training was performed, both to reflect the thoughts of trainees themselves and to highlight specific areas requiring improvement. METHODS: Sixty-four basic specialist trainees (44 surgical [BSTs] and 20 physician [BPTs]) from all of the major Melbourne metropolitan teaching hospitals completed an anonymous survey. RESULTS: Surgical trainees considered all areas of hospital-based training to be deficient, with overall dissatisfaction significantly greater for BSTs compared with BPTs (P=0.046). A requirement for increased hospital-based training was similarly greater for BSTs (P=0.0072). CONCLUSION: The study confirms the need for a change in the regulation and administration of hospital-based teaching for surgical trainees.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rozen, W. M., Kaplan, E. D., Drummond, K. J., & Millar, R. J. (2007). A tale of two colleges: do specialist trainees receive adequate hospital-based training? Australian Health Review : A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 31(3), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH070362

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free