Vascular calcifications as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk: A meta-analysis

371Citations
Citations of this article
187Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Several imaging techniques may reveal calcification of the arterial wall or cardiac valves. Many studies indicate that the risk for cardiovascular disease is increased when calcification is present. Recent meta-analyses on coronary calcification and cardiovascular risk may be confounded by indication. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed with extensive subgroup analysis to assess the overall cardiovascular risk of finding calcification in any arterial wall or cardiac valve when using different imaging techniques. Methods and results: A meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting calcifications and cardiovascular end-points was performed. Thirty articles were selected. The overall odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for calcifications versus no calcifications in 218,080 subjects after a mean follow-up of 10.1 years amounted to 4.62 (CI 2.24 to 9.53) for all cause mortality, 3.94 (CI 2.39 to 6.50) for cardiovascular mortality, 3.74 (CI 2.56 to 5.45) for coronary events, 2.21 (CI 1.81 to 2.69) for stroke, and 3.41 (CI 2.71 to 4.30) for any cardiovascular event. Heterogeneity was largely explained by length of follow up and sort of imaging technique. Subgroup analysis of patients with end stage renal disease revealed a much higher odds ratio for any event of 6.22 (CI 2.73 to 14.14). Conclusion: The presence of calcification in any arterial wall is associated with a 3-4-fold higher risk for mortality and cardiovascular events. Interpretation of the pooled estimates has to be done with caution because of heterogeneity across studies. © 2009 Rennenberg et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rennenberg, R. J. M. W., Kessels, A. G. H., Schurgers, L. J., Van Engelshoven, J. M. A., De Leeuw, P. W., & Kroon, A. A. (2009). Vascular calcifications as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk: A meta-analysis. Vascular Health and Risk Management, 5, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.s4822

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free