Assessment of Experimental Skills in Physics : A Comparison

  • Schreiber N
  • Theyßen H
  • Schecker H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The acquisition of experimental skills is widely regarded as an important part of sci-ence education. Models describing experimental skills usually distinguish between three dimen-sions of an experiment: preparation, performance and data evaluation. Valid assessment proce-dures for experimental skills have to consider all these three dimensions. Hands-on tests can es-pecially account for the performance dimension. However, in large-scale assessments the analysis of students' performances is usually only based on the products of the experiments. But does this test format sufficiently account for a student's ability to carry out experiments? A process-oriented analysis that considers the quality of students' actions, e.g. while setting up an experi-ment or measuring, provides a broader basis for assessments. At the same time it is more time-consuming. In our study we compared a process-oriented and a product-oriented analysis of hands-on tests. Results show medium correlations between both analysis methods in the perfor-mance dimension and rather high correlations in the dimensions preparation and data evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schreiber, N., Theyßen, H., & Schecker, H. (2016). Assessment of Experimental Skills in Physics : A Comparison. Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning, 29–43.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free