Purpose: A key challenge for providers and commissioners of rehabilitation services is to find optimal balance between service costs and outcomes. This article presents a "real-lifeâ application of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative (UKROC) dataset. We undertook a comparative cohort analysis of case-episode data (n = 173) from two specialist neurological rehabilitation units (A and B), to compare the cost-efficiency of two service models. Key messages: (i) Demographics, casemix and levels of functional dependency on admission and discharge were broadly similar for the two units. (ii) The mean length of stay for Unit A was 1.5 times longer than Unit B, which had 85% higher levels of therapy staffing in relation to occupied bed days so despite higher bed-day costs, Unit B was 20% more cost-efficient overall, for similar gain. (iii) Following analysis, engagement with service commissioners led to successful negotiation of a business plan for service reconfiguration with increased staffing levels for Unit A and further development of local community rehabilitation services. Conclusion: (i) Lower front-end service costs do not always signify optimal cost-efficiency. (ii) Analysis of routinely collected clinical data can be used to engage commissioners and to make the case for resources to maximise efficiency and improve patient care. Implications for Rehabilitation A key challenge for the provision of rehabilitation services is to strike a cost-effective balance between outcome and service cost, particularly for highly complex cases. This article presents a "real-lifeâ application of the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative (UKROC) dataset from two tertiary neurological rehabilitation services to demonstrate how the dataset may be used to compare the cost-efficiency of different service models. Analysis of routinely collected clinical data can be used to engage commissioners and to make the case for resources to maximize efficiency and improve patient care. © 2012 Informa UK, Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Turner-Stokes, L., Poppleton, R., Williams, H., Schoewenaars, K., & Badwan, D. (2012). Using the UKROC dataset to make the case for resources to improve cost-efficiency in neurological rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(22), 1900–1906. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.670042
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.