The case for dumb requirements engineering tools

60Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

[Context and Motivation] This paper notes the advanced state of the natural language (NL) processing art and considers four broad categories of tools for processing NL requirements documents. These tools are used in a variety of scenarios. The strength of a tool for a NL processing task is measured by its recall and precision. [Question/Problem] In some scenarios, for some tasks, any tool with less than 100% recall is not helpful and the user may be better off doing the task entirely manually. [Principal Ideas/Results] The paper suggests that perhaps a dumb tool doing an identifiable part of such a task may be better than an intelligent tool trying but failing in unidentifiable ways to do the entire task. [Contribution] Perhaps a new direction is needed in research for RE tools. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berry, D., Gacitua, R., Sawyer, P., & Tjong, S. F. (2012). The case for dumb requirements engineering tools. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7195 LNCS, pp. 211–217). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28714-5_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free