On the risks of a constant RBE for proton treatment planning

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although it is well known that protons do not have a constant RBE of 1.1 this value is used in the daily clinical routine. To assess the impact of a variable RBE we have optimized proton treatment plans using a constant RBE and afterwards recalculated the RBE applying a method that is based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) model. We performed the study by creating treatment plans for four patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the LQ-model was introduced by a linear dependence of the parameter alpha on the LET. For each volume of interest an individual set of model parameters alpha and beta derived from literature values has been used. The LET dependence was assumed to be the same for all tissues. The results have been compared as RBE-weighted absorbed dose distributions. It could be shown that the differences between variable and constant RBE distributions depend mainly on the choice of parameters but locally a severe increase in RBE-weighted absorbed dose could be observed due to regions of high LET. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frese, M. C., Taheri-Kadkhoda, Z., Wilkens, J. J., & Oelfke, U. (2009). On the risks of a constant RBE for proton treatment planning. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 25, pp. 76–79). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free