Evaluating impact of re-training a lexical disambiguation model on domain adaptation of an HPSG parser

27Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes an effective approach to adapting an HPSG parser trained on the Penn Treebank to a biomedical domain. In this approach, we train probabilities of lexical entry assignments to words in a target domain and then incorporate them into the original parser. Experimental results show that this method can obtain higher parsing accuracy than previous work on domain adaptation for parsing the same data. Moreover, the results show that the combination of the proposed method and the existing method achieves parsing accuracy that is as high as that of an HPSG parser retrained from scratch, but with much lower training cost. We also evaluated our method in the Brown corpus to show the portability of our approach in another domain.

References Powered by Scopus

Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning

1244Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GENIA corpus - A semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining

976Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation

182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: Opportunities and challenges

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ChemicalTagger: A tool for semantic text-mining in chemistry

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating contributions of natural language parsers to protein-protein interaction extraction

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hara, T., Miyao, Y., & Tsujii, J. (2007). Evaluating impact of re-training a lexical disambiguation model on domain adaptation of an HPSG parser. In IWPT 2007 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (pp. 11–22). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1621410.1621412

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

52%

Researcher 12

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 36

75%

Linguistics 8

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

4%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free