Instruments to Evaluate Physical-Emotional Perceptions in Medical Anatomy Students. Systematic Review

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Physical-emotional perceptions have proven connotations in training and professional future. To analyze the evidence on the measurement instruments to evaluate the physical-emotional perceptions in students of Anatomy in medicine. Systematic review in which observational studies from 2010 to 2020 were consulted in the Scopus, Ovid, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Web of Science and ProQuest databases, with validated search terms. The study selection process was synthesized in a flow chart. Data extraction and quality assessment were done by three independent reviewers using scales from the National Institutes of Health in the United States; The agreement between reviewers was assessed with the Fleiss kappa coefficient. 28 differentiated studies were included in validated measurement instruments (n 16) and studies that used other collection instruments (n 12). The most frequent types of validation were internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha and construct, factor analysis. There is an acceptable number of instruments that evaluate the subject, new studies are required that provide evidence of the rigor in the measurement processes with cross-cultural adaptation and of different types of instrument validation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martha, B. G., Monica, Q. M., Sara, S. O., & Blanka, P. O. (2022). Instruments to Evaluate Physical-Emotional Perceptions in Medical Anatomy Students. Systematic Review. International Journal of Morphology. Universidad de la Frontera. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022022000400946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free