A divide between the western European and the central and eastern European countries in the peripheral vascular field: A narrative review of the literature

10Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thirty years after the transition period, starting from 1989, Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs), representing one‐fifth of the entire European population, share many historical, societal, political, economic, and cultural characteristics. Although accumulating data on coronary heart diseases and cerebrovascular diseases support these observations, in the case of peripheral arterial disease, data are scarce. The present review attempts to summarise the shreds of data that may highlight a divide in this field between CEECs and Western European countries. Disparities in risk factors and peripheral vascular care across Europe seem to be tangible and can be seen as a signal of existing differences. Improvements in research and development and the collection and cross‐border share of scientific data are essential to initiate and facilitate convergence in this field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kolossváry, E., Björck, M., & Behrendt, C. A. (2021, August 2). A divide between the western European and the central and eastern European countries in the peripheral vascular field: A narrative review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163553

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free