The Problem of Nonhuman Phenomenology: or, What is it Like to Be a Kinect?

  • Pasek A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

New materialism presents an ambitious revision of key philosophical and political concepts, most notably that of the divide between human and nonhuman agents. In order to move critical inquiry outside of the labyrinths of language and subjectivity so that it might also attend to the material effects and actions of the nonhuman world, threads of human exceptionalism must be untangled from some of the West’s most basic ontological principles. From Bruno Latour’s expansion of the concept of agency to include nonhuman objects to Karen Barard’s concept of the post-human performativity of intra-acting matter there has been a rapid expanse of scholarship that attests to the influential role the material plays in the mechanics of human operations and indeed the need to dethrone the human from its central place in ethical, philosophical, and political concerns.1 This

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pasek, A. (2015). The Problem of Nonhuman Phenomenology: or, What is it Like to Be a Kinect? InVisible Culture. https://doi.org/10.47761/494a02f6.6a97b461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free