We present a dynamic deontic model for the interpretation of imperative sentences in terms of Obligation (O) and Permission (P). Under the view that imperatives prescribe actions and unlike the so-called "standard solution" (Huntley [10]) these operators act over actions rather that over statements. By distinguishing obligatory from non-obligatory actions we tackle the paradox of Free Choice Permission (FCP). © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.
CITATION STYLE
Pérez-Ramírez, M., & Fox, C. (2003). Imperatives as obligatory and permitted actions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2588, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36456-0_6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.